Golden Dawn Z-2 Invisibility
- Pat Zalewski

- Jul 8
- 3 min read

The so‑called Invisibility Ritual in the Golden Dawn Z‑2 documents has always struck me as one of the system’s more curious and problematic inclusions. Over the years I’ve asked a wide range of people about it, including former members of the Whare Ra temple in New Zealand, and not one of them had ever heard of it being used, taught, or even seriously discussed. When I asked Jack Taylor about it, he simply threw his arms up in the air and changed the subject, which says a great deal about how uncomfortable or dubious the topic felt even to senior initiates. In conversations with practitioners from various Golden Dawn‑derived groups, I found that people tended to fall into three camps: those who believed the ritual worked as written, those who rejected it outright, and those who believed it was intended for something else entirely, not literal invisibility, but a method for becoming unnoticed or blending into the background. This last interpretation was by far the most common, though even it raises practical questions: when should one apply such a technique, how long does it last, and what are the ethical implications of using ritual to manipulate perception?
When I met Israel Regardie, he told me that he had actually performed the ritual in front of Bristol Chief Adept Hope Hughes. Hughes placed a large mirror in the temple so she could observe whether anything happened. After Regardie completed the ritual, he asked her if it had worked, and she replied that he “flickered.” This anecdote is revealing because it shows that both Regardie and Hughes treated the ritual as something capable of producing literal, observable effects. They were not approaching it as metaphor or psychological symbolism; they genuinely believed that some degree of physical invisibility might occur. Some years ago, I believe it may have been Tony Fuller who uncovered it, in a letter surfaced from one of the Hughes sisters. My memory may not be perfect, but the essence of the letter was clear: she claimed that modern Golden Dawn practitioners could not match the abilities of the original members because a certain “density” existed in the world today that did not exist in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. This density supposedly prevented many of the feats once performed by the old adepts. Whether one accepts this explanation or not, the letter is valuable because it reveals the mindset of some senior Golden Dawn figures. These were highly intelligent people, yet they sincerely believed that invisibility, or something close to it, was achievable under the right conditions. Their worldview allowed for phenomena that most modern practitioners would consider impossible or purely symbolic.
In my opinion, Mathers went too far in including the Invisibility Ritual in the Z‑2 formulae. It stands out as an example of the system stretching beyond what is workable or defensible, even within a magical framework. Its presence has caused confusion for generations of students, and the historical record suggests that even the most experienced adepts rarely, if ever, used it. The ritual remains fascinating as a piece of Golden Dawn lore, but its practical value is questionable. At best, it may function as a psychological technique for reducing one’s presence or projecting neutrality; at worst, it represents an aspirational magical feat that was never realistically attainable.




Comments